Disabling User Account Control via Registry Modification
User Account Control (UAC) can help mitigate the impact of malware on Windows hosts. With UAC, apps and tasks always run in the security context of a non-administrator account, unless an administrator specifically authorizes administrator-level access to the system. This rule identifies registry value changes to bypass User Access Control (UAC) protection.
Elastic rule (View on GitHub)
1[metadata]
2creation_date = "2021/01/20"
3integration = ["endpoint", "windows"]
4maturity = "production"
5updated_date = "2024/09/23"
6
7[rule]
8author = ["Elastic"]
9description = """
10User Account Control (UAC) can help mitigate the impact of malware on Windows hosts. With UAC, apps and tasks always run
11in the security context of a non-administrator account, unless an administrator specifically authorizes
12administrator-level access to the system. This rule identifies registry value changes to bypass User Access Control
13(UAC) protection.
14"""
15from = "now-9m"
16index = ["winlogbeat-*", "logs-endpoint.events.registry-*", "logs-windows.sysmon_operational-*", "endgame-*"]
17language = "eql"
18license = "Elastic License v2"
19name = "Disabling User Account Control via Registry Modification"
20note = """## Triage and analysis
21
22### Investigating Disabling User Account Control via Registry Modification
23
24Windows User Account Control (UAC) allows a program to elevate its privileges (tracked as low to high integrity levels) to perform a task under administrator-level permissions, possibly by prompting the user for confirmation. UAC can deny an operation under high-integrity enforcement, or allow the user to perform the action if they are in the local administrators group and enter an administrator password when prompted.
25
26For more information about the UAC and how it works, check the [official Microsoft docs page](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/user-account-control/how-user-account-control-works).
27
28Attackers may disable UAC to execute code directly in high integrity. This rule identifies registry value changes to bypass the UAC protection.
29
30#### Possible investigation steps
31
32- Investigate the process execution chain (parent process tree) for unknown processes. Examine their executable files for prevalence, whether they are located in expected locations, and if they are signed with valid digital signatures.
33- Investigate other alerts associated with the user/host during the past 48 hours.
34- Inspect the host for suspicious or abnormal behaviors in the alert timeframe.
35- Investigate abnormal behaviors observed by the subject process such as network connections, registry or file modifications, and any spawned child processes.
36- Analyze non-system processes executed with high integrity after UAC was disabled for unknown or suspicious processes.
37- Retrieve the suspicious processes' executables and determine if they are malicious:
38 - Use a private sandboxed malware analysis system to perform analysis.
39 - Observe and collect information about the following activities:
40 - Attempts to contact external domains and addresses.
41 - File and registry access, modification, and creation activities.
42 - Service creation and launch activities.
43 - Scheduled tasks creation.
44 - Use the PowerShell `Get-FileHash` cmdlet to get the files' SHA-256 hash values.
45 - Search for the existence and reputation of the hashes in resources like VirusTotal, Hybrid-Analysis, CISCO Talos, Any.run, etc.
46
47### False positive analysis
48
49- This activity is unlikely to happen legitimately. Benign true positives (B-TPs) can be added as exceptions if necessary.
50
51### Response and remediation
52
53- Initiate the incident response process based on the outcome of the triage.
54- Isolate the involved host to prevent further post-compromise behavior.
55- If the triage identified malware, search the environment for additional compromised hosts.
56 - Implement temporary network rules, procedures, and segmentation to contain the malware.
57 - Stop suspicious processes.
58 - Immediately block the identified indicators of compromise (IoCs).
59 - Inspect the affected systems for additional malware backdoors like reverse shells, reverse proxies, or droppers that attackers could use to reinfect the system.
60- Remove and block malicious artifacts identified during triage.
61- Restore UAC settings to the desired state.
62- Run a full antimalware scan. This may reveal additional artifacts left in the system, persistence mechanisms, and malware components.
63- Investigate credential exposure on systems compromised or used by the attacker to ensure all compromised accounts are identified. Reset passwords for these accounts and other potentially compromised credentials, such as email, business systems, and web services.
64- Determine the initial vector abused by the attacker and take action to prevent reinfection through the same vector.
65- Using the incident response data, update logging and audit policies to improve the mean time to detect (MTTD) and the mean time to respond (MTTR).
66"""
67references = [
68 "https://www.greyhathacker.net/?p=796",
69 "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/user-account-control/user-account-control-group-policy-and-registry-key-settings",
70 "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/user-account-control/user-account-control-overview",
71 "https://www.elastic.co/security-labs/dissecting-remcos-rat-part-four",
72]
73risk_score = 47
74rule_id = "d31f183a-e5b1-451b-8534-ba62bca0b404"
75setup = """## Setup
76
77If enabling an EQL rule on a non-elastic-agent index (such as beats) for versions <8.2,
78events will not define `event.ingested` and default fallback for EQL rules was not added until version 8.2.
79Hence for this rule to work effectively, users will need to add a custom ingest pipeline to populate
80`event.ingested` to @timestamp.
81For more details on adding a custom ingest pipeline refer - https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/fleet/current/data-streams-pipeline-tutorial.html
82"""
83severity = "medium"
84tags = [
85 "Domain: Endpoint",
86 "OS: Windows",
87 "Use Case: Threat Detection",
88 "Tactic: Privilege Escalation",
89 "Resources: Investigation Guide",
90 "Data Source: Elastic Endgame",
91 "Data Source: Elastic Defend",
92 "Data Source: Sysmon",
93]
94timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
95type = "eql"
96
97query = '''
98registry where host.os.type == "windows" and event.type == "change" and
99 registry.path :
100 (
101 "HKLM\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Policies\\System\\EnableLUA",
102 "HKLM\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Policies\\System\\ConsentPromptBehaviorAdmin",
103 "HKLM\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Policies\\System\\PromptOnSecureDesktop",
104 "\\REGISTRY\\MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Policies\\System\\EnableLUA",
105 "\\REGISTRY\\MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Policies\\System\\ConsentPromptBehaviorAdmin",
106 "\\REGISTRY\\MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Policies\\System\\PromptOnSecureDesktop"
107 ) and
108 registry.data.strings : ("0", "0x00000000")
109'''
110
111
112[[rule.threat]]
113framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
114[[rule.threat.technique]]
115id = "T1548"
116name = "Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism"
117reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1548/"
118[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
119id = "T1548.002"
120name = "Bypass User Account Control"
121reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1548/002/"
122
123
124
125[rule.threat.tactic]
126id = "TA0004"
127name = "Privilege Escalation"
128reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0004/"
129[[rule.threat]]
130framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
131[[rule.threat.technique]]
132id = "T1112"
133name = "Modify Registry"
134reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1112/"
135
136[[rule.threat.technique]]
137id = "T1548"
138name = "Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism"
139reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1548/"
140[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
141id = "T1548.002"
142name = "Bypass User Account Control"
143reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1548/002/"
144
145
146[[rule.threat.technique]]
147id = "T1562"
148name = "Impair Defenses"
149reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1562/"
150[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
151id = "T1562.001"
152name = "Disable or Modify Tools"
153reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1562/001/"
154
155
156
157[rule.threat.tactic]
158id = "TA0005"
159name = "Defense Evasion"
160reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0005/"
Triage and analysis
Investigating Disabling User Account Control via Registry Modification
Windows User Account Control (UAC) allows a program to elevate its privileges (tracked as low to high integrity levels) to perform a task under administrator-level permissions, possibly by prompting the user for confirmation. UAC can deny an operation under high-integrity enforcement, or allow the user to perform the action if they are in the local administrators group and enter an administrator password when prompted.
For more information about the UAC and how it works, check the official Microsoft docs page.
Attackers may disable UAC to execute code directly in high integrity. This rule identifies registry value changes to bypass the UAC protection.
Possible investigation steps
- Investigate the process execution chain (parent process tree) for unknown processes. Examine their executable files for prevalence, whether they are located in expected locations, and if they are signed with valid digital signatures.
- Investigate other alerts associated with the user/host during the past 48 hours.
- Inspect the host for suspicious or abnormal behaviors in the alert timeframe.
- Investigate abnormal behaviors observed by the subject process such as network connections, registry or file modifications, and any spawned child processes.
- Analyze non-system processes executed with high integrity after UAC was disabled for unknown or suspicious processes.
- Retrieve the suspicious processes' executables and determine if they are malicious:
- Use a private sandboxed malware analysis system to perform analysis.
- Observe and collect information about the following activities:
- Attempts to contact external domains and addresses.
- File and registry access, modification, and creation activities.
- Service creation and launch activities.
- Scheduled tasks creation.
- Observe and collect information about the following activities:
- Use the PowerShell
Get-FileHash
cmdlet to get the files' SHA-256 hash values.- Search for the existence and reputation of the hashes in resources like VirusTotal, Hybrid-Analysis, CISCO Talos, Any.run, etc.
- Use a private sandboxed malware analysis system to perform analysis.
False positive analysis
- This activity is unlikely to happen legitimately. Benign true positives (B-TPs) can be added as exceptions if necessary.
Response and remediation
- Initiate the incident response process based on the outcome of the triage.
- Isolate the involved host to prevent further post-compromise behavior.
- If the triage identified malware, search the environment for additional compromised hosts.
- Implement temporary network rules, procedures, and segmentation to contain the malware.
- Stop suspicious processes.
- Immediately block the identified indicators of compromise (IoCs).
- Inspect the affected systems for additional malware backdoors like reverse shells, reverse proxies, or droppers that attackers could use to reinfect the system.
- Remove and block malicious artifacts identified during triage.
- Restore UAC settings to the desired state.
- Run a full antimalware scan. This may reveal additional artifacts left in the system, persistence mechanisms, and malware components.
- Investigate credential exposure on systems compromised or used by the attacker to ensure all compromised accounts are identified. Reset passwords for these accounts and other potentially compromised credentials, such as email, business systems, and web services.
- Determine the initial vector abused by the attacker and take action to prevent reinfection through the same vector.
- Using the incident response data, update logging and audit policies to improve the mean time to detect (MTTD) and the mean time to respond (MTTR).
References
Related rules
- Suspicious DLL Loaded for Persistence or Privilege Escalation
- Conhost Spawned By Suspicious Parent Process
- UAC Bypass via Windows Firewall Snap-In Hijack
- Service Control Spawned via Script Interpreter
- Startup Persistence by a Suspicious Process