Multiple Device Token Hashes for Single Okta Session

This rule detects when a specific Okta actor has multiple device token hashes for a single Okta session. This may indicate an authenticated session has been hijacked or is being used by multiple devices. Adversaries may hijack a session to gain unauthorized access to Okta admin console, applications, tenants, or other resources.

Elastic rule (View on GitHub)

  1[metadata]
  2creation_date = "2023/11/08"
  3integration = ["okta"]
  4maturity = "production"
  5updated_date = "2025/09/25"
  6
  7[rule]
  8author = ["Elastic"]
  9description = """
 10This rule detects when a specific Okta actor has multiple device token hashes for a single Okta session. This may
 11indicate an authenticated session has been hijacked or is being used by multiple devices. Adversaries may hijack a
 12session to gain unauthorized access to Okta admin console, applications, tenants, or other resources.
 13"""
 14from = "now-9m"
 15language = "esql"
 16license = "Elastic License v2"
 17name = "Multiple Device Token Hashes for Single Okta Session"
 18note = """## Triage and analysis
 19
 20### Investigating Multiple Device Token Hashes for Single Okta Session
 21
 22This rule detects when a specific Okta actor has multiple device token hashes for a single Okta session. This may indicate an authenticated session has been hijacked or is being used by multiple devices. Adversaries may hijack a session to gain unauthorized access to Okta admin console, applications, tenants, or other resources.
 23
 24#### Possible investigation steps:
 25- Since this is an ESQL rule, the `okta.actor.alternate_id` and `okta.authentication_context.external_session_id` values can be used to pivot into the raw authentication events related to this alert.
 26- Identify the users involved in this action by examining the `okta.actor.id`, `okta.actor.type`, `okta.actor.alternate_id`, and `okta.actor.display_name` fields.
 27- Determine the device client used for these actions by analyzing `okta.client.ip`, `okta.client.user_agent.raw_user_agent`, `okta.client.zone`, `okta.client.device`, and `okta.client.id` fields.
 28- With Okta end users identified, review the `okta.debug_context.debug_data.dt_hash` field.
 29    - Historical analysis should indicate if this device token hash is commonly associated with the user.
 30- Review the `okta.event_type` field to determine the type of authentication event that occurred.
 31    - Authentication events have been filtered out to focus on Okta activity via established sessions.
 32- Review the past activities of the actor(s) involved in this action by checking their previous actions.
 33- Evaluate the actions that happened just before and after this event in the `okta.event_type` field to help understand the full context of the activity.
 34    - This may help determine the authentication and authorization actions that occurred between the user, Okta and application.
 35- Aggregate by `okta.actor.alternate_id` and `event.action` to determine the type of actions that are being performed by the actor(s) involved in this action.
 36    - If various activity is reported that seems to indicate actions from separate users, consider deactivating the user's account temporarily.
 37
 38### False positive analysis:
 39- It is very rare that a legitimate user would have multiple device token hashes for a single Okta session as DT hashes do not change after an authenticated session is established.
 40
 41### Response and remediation:
 42- Consider stopping all sessions for the user(s) involved in this action.
 43- If this does not appear to be a false positive, consider resetting passwords for the users involved and enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA).
 44    - If MFA is already enabled, consider resetting MFA for the users.
 45- If any of the users are not legitimate, consider deactivating the user's account.
 46- Conduct a review of Okta policies and ensure they are in accordance with security best practices.
 47- Check with internal IT teams to determine if the accounts involved recently had MFA reset at the request of the user.
 48    - If so, confirm with the user this was a legitimate request.
 49    - If so and this was not a legitimate request, consider deactivating the user's account temporarily.
 50        - Reset passwords and reset MFA for the user.
 51- Alternatively adding `okta.client.ip` or a CIDR range to the `exceptions` list can prevent future occurrences of this event from triggering the rule.
 52    - This should be done with caution as it may prevent legitimate alerts from being generated.
 53"""
 54references = [
 55    "https://developer.okta.com/docs/reference/api/system-log/",
 56    "https://developer.okta.com/docs/reference/api/event-types/",
 57    "https://www.elastic.co/security-labs/testing-okta-visibility-and-detection-dorothy",
 58    "https://sec.okta.com/articles/2023/08/cross-tenant-impersonation-prevention-and-detection",
 59    "https://support.okta.com/help/s/article/session-hijacking-attack-definition-damage-defense?language=en_US",
 60    "https://www.elastic.co/security-labs/monitoring-okta-threats-with-elastic-security",
 61    "https://www.elastic.co/security-labs/starter-guide-to-understanding-okta",
 62]
 63risk_score = 47
 64rule_id = "cc382a2e-7e52-11ee-9aac-f661ea17fbcd"
 65setup = """## Setup
 66
 67The Okta Fleet integration, Filebeat module, or similarly structured data is required to be compatible with this rule."""
 68severity = "medium"
 69tags = [
 70    "Use Case: Identity and Access Audit",
 71    "Data Source: Okta",
 72    "Tactic: Credential Access",
 73    "Domain: SaaS",
 74    "Resources: Investigation Guide",
 75]
 76timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
 77type = "esql"
 78
 79query = '''
 80from logs-okta*
 81| where
 82    event.dataset == "okta.system" and
 83    not event.action in (
 84        "policy.evaluate_sign_on",
 85        "user.session.start",
 86        "user.authentication.sso"
 87    ) and
 88    okta.actor.alternate_id != "system@okta.com" and
 89    okta.actor.alternate_id rlike "[^@\\s]+\\@[^@\\s]+" and
 90    okta.authentication_context.external_session_id != "unknown"
 91| keep
 92    event.action,
 93    okta.actor.alternate_id,
 94    okta.authentication_context.external_session_id,
 95    okta.debug_context.debug_data.dt_hash
 96| stats
 97    Esql.okta_debug_context_debug_data_dt_hash_count_distinct = count_distinct(okta.debug_context.debug_data.dt_hash)
 98  by
 99    okta.actor.alternate_id,
100    okta.authentication_context.external_session_id
101| where
102    Esql.okta_debug_context_debug_data_dt_hash_count_distinct >= 2
103| sort
104    Esql.okta_debug_context_debug_data_dt_hash_count_distinct desc
105'''
106
107
108[[rule.threat]]
109framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
110[[rule.threat.technique]]
111id = "T1539"
112name = "Steal Web Session Cookie"
113reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1539/"
114
115
116[rule.threat.tactic]
117id = "TA0006"
118name = "Credential Access"
119reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0006/"

Triage and analysis

Investigating Multiple Device Token Hashes for Single Okta Session

This rule detects when a specific Okta actor has multiple device token hashes for a single Okta session. This may indicate an authenticated session has been hijacked or is being used by multiple devices. Adversaries may hijack a session to gain unauthorized access to Okta admin console, applications, tenants, or other resources.

Possible investigation steps:

  • Since this is an ESQL rule, the okta.actor.alternate_id and okta.authentication_context.external_session_id values can be used to pivot into the raw authentication events related to this alert.
  • Identify the users involved in this action by examining the okta.actor.id, okta.actor.type, okta.actor.alternate_id, and okta.actor.display_name fields.
  • Determine the device client used for these actions by analyzing okta.client.ip, okta.client.user_agent.raw_user_agent, okta.client.zone, okta.client.device, and okta.client.id fields.
  • With Okta end users identified, review the okta.debug_context.debug_data.dt_hash field.
    • Historical analysis should indicate if this device token hash is commonly associated with the user.
  • Review the okta.event_type field to determine the type of authentication event that occurred.
    • Authentication events have been filtered out to focus on Okta activity via established sessions.
  • Review the past activities of the actor(s) involved in this action by checking their previous actions.
  • Evaluate the actions that happened just before and after this event in the okta.event_type field to help understand the full context of the activity.
    • This may help determine the authentication and authorization actions that occurred between the user, Okta and application.
  • Aggregate by okta.actor.alternate_id and event.action to determine the type of actions that are being performed by the actor(s) involved in this action.
    • If various activity is reported that seems to indicate actions from separate users, consider deactivating the user's account temporarily.

False positive analysis:

  • It is very rare that a legitimate user would have multiple device token hashes for a single Okta session as DT hashes do not change after an authenticated session is established.

Response and remediation:

  • Consider stopping all sessions for the user(s) involved in this action.
  • If this does not appear to be a false positive, consider resetting passwords for the users involved and enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA).
    • If MFA is already enabled, consider resetting MFA for the users.
  • If any of the users are not legitimate, consider deactivating the user's account.
  • Conduct a review of Okta policies and ensure they are in accordance with security best practices.
  • Check with internal IT teams to determine if the accounts involved recently had MFA reset at the request of the user.
    • If so, confirm with the user this was a legitimate request.
    • If so and this was not a legitimate request, consider deactivating the user's account temporarily.
      • Reset passwords and reset MFA for the user.
  • Alternatively adding okta.client.ip or a CIDR range to the exceptions list can prevent future occurrences of this event from triggering the rule.
    • This should be done with caution as it may prevent legitimate alerts from being generated.

References

Related rules

to-top