Potential DNS Tunneling via NULL or Long DNS Queries
Identifies DNS query patterns associated with tunneling, including rare NULL queries, repeated TXT queries with unusually long names, and clients generating many unique, long subdomains under one registered domain within a five-minute window.
Elastic rule (View on GitHub)
1[metadata]
2creation_date = "2026/08/20"
3integration = ["network_traffic", "fortinet_fortigate", "zeek"]
4maturity = "production"
5updated_date = "2026/09/21"
6
7[rule]
8author = ["Elastic"]
9description = """
10Identifies DNS query patterns associated with tunneling, including rare NULL queries, repeated TXT queries with
11unusually long names, and clients generating many unique, long subdomains under one registered domain within a
12five-minute window.
13"""
14false_positives = [
15 """
16 CDN, cloud load-balancer, software-update, and telemetry hostnames can be long and change often. Recursive
17 resolvers, forwarders, NAT gateways, and localhost DNS listeners can also combine queries from many endpoints under
18 one client address. DNS research, testing, and security tools can generate NULL or unusually long TXT queries.
19 Validate the apex domain and whether the source is an endpoint before treating the activity as tunneling.
20 """,
21]
22from = "now-9m"
23language = "esql"
24license = "Elastic License v2"
25name = "Potential DNS Tunneling via NULL or Long DNS Queries"
26note = """## Triage and analysis
27
28### Investigating Potential DNS Tunneling via NULL or Long DNS Queries
29
30DNS tunneling encodes data in query labels and often produces many unique, unusually long subdomains under a single apex
31domain. Some tunneling tools also use rare NULL queries or long TXT query names. This rule aggregates network DNS
32telemetry for those behavioral patterns without relying on threat intelligence feeds or machine learning jobs.
33
34Compare overlapping apex domains against the machine learning **DNS Tunneling** rule when that job is enabled.
35
36### Possible investigation steps
37
38- Review `Esql.dns_registered_domain`, `Esql.dns_question_type_values`, `Esql.total_qualifying_queries`,
39 `Esql.count_distinct_names`, `Esql.unique_name_ratio`, `Esql.max_question_name_length`,
40 `Esql.max_subdomain_length`, and sample values in `Esql.sample_names`.
41- NULL alerts require at least three queries and two distinct names. Long-TXT alerts require at least five distinct
42 names longer than 100 characters. The general long-subdomain branch retains the original threshold of 25 queries and
43 15 distinct names across all query types.
44- `Esql.count_queries`, `Esql.count_distinct_names`, and `Esql.unique_name_ratio` describe only long-subdomain
45 activity. For alerts triggered only by NULL or long-TXT queries, both counts may be zero and the ratio will be null.
46- TXT, NULL, CNAME, or MX bursts increase confidence; A/AAAA-only activity can still be tunneling and should not be
47 dismissed on type alone.
48- Use `Esql.first_seen`, `Esql.last_seen`, `Esql.dataset_values`, and `Esql.observer_name_values` to establish the event
49 span and identify the integrations and sensors that contributed to the alert.
50- Confirm whether `Esql.client_ip` is a workstation, server, recursive resolver, forwarder, NAT address, or localhost
51 DNS service. Resolver and localhost sources merge many clients and are a common false-positive pattern.
52- Review `Esql.destination_ip_values` to identify the resolver or authoritative destination observed by the sensor.
53- Pivot on the same client and apex domain in raw DNS events and look for follow-on process, file, or additional C2
54 activity.
55
56### False positive analysis
57
58- CDN, cloud load-balancer, certificate, and software-update services often create long hostnames. Confirm the apex
59 domain reputation and whether the requesting host role normally uses that provider.
60- Security or network appliances performing DNS-based reachability or reputation checks can resemble tunneling. Exclude
61 confirmed appliance addresses after validation.
62- Do not create a global resolver exception until the originating endpoint is known; a shared `Esql.client_ip` can hide
63 a single infected host behind legitimate bulk lookups.
64
65### Response and remediation
66
67- Block the apex domain or forwarding from the affected host at recursive resolvers if malicious activity is confirmed.
68- Isolate the source host and inspect for tunneling tools or malware initiating the queries.
69- Add temporary blocks for the apex domain while scoping additional hosts querying the same name.
70"""
71references = [
72 "https://code.kryo.se/iodine/",
73 "https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/dns-tunneling-how-dns-can-be-abused-by-malicious-actors/",
74]
75risk_score = 47
76rule_id = "89ed957d-609b-4b00-b8c6-a5cbd187632c"
77setup = """## Setup
78
79This rule requires DNS transaction events from one of the following sources:
80
81- Elastic Network Packet Capture (`network_traffic.dns`) in `logs-network_traffic.dns-*`
82- Fortinet FortiGate DNS logs (`fortinet_fortigate.log`) in `logs-fortinet_fortigate.log-*`
83- Elastic Zeek (`zeek.dns`) in `logs-zeek.dns-*`
84- Legacy Packetbeat DNS events in `packetbeat-*` with `event.dataset` set to `dns`
85
86Place the sensor where it observes endpoint-to-resolver DNS traffic. If the sensor is upstream of a recursive resolver,
87or if the captured client is a localhost listener such as `127.0.0.1`, `Esql.client_ip` may identify shared DNS
88infrastructure instead of the originating endpoint.
89
90DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH), DNS-over-TLS (DoT), and other encrypted DNS traffic are not visible to packet capture unless the
91sensor receives decrypted DNS telemetry or equivalent resolver logs mapped to ECS.
92"""
93severity = "medium"
94tags = [
95 "Domain: Network",
96 "Use Case: Threat Detection",
97 "Use Case: Network Security Monitoring",
98 "Rule Type: ES|QL",
99 "Tactic: Command and Control",
100 "Tactic: Exfiltration",
101 "Data Source: Network Packet Capture",
102 "Data Source: Fortinet",
103 "Data Source: Network Traffic",
104 "Data Source: Zeek",
105 "Resources: Investigation Guide",
106]
107timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
108type = "esql"
109
110query = '''
111from logs-network_traffic.dns-*, logs-fortinet_fortigate.log-*, logs-zeek.dns-*, packetbeat-*
112| where
113 (
114 data_stream.dataset in ("network_traffic.dns", "fortinet_fortigate.log", "zeek.dns")
115 or event.dataset == "dns"
116 )
117 and dns.question.name is not null
118 and dns.question.registered_domain is not null
119| eval
120 Esql.client_ip = COALESCE(client.ip, source.ip),
121 Esql.dataset = COALESCE(data_stream.dataset, event.dataset),
122 Esql.dns_question_name = TO_LOWER(dns.question.name),
123 Esql.dns_registered_domain = TO_LOWER(dns.question.registered_domain),
124 Esql.dns_question_type = TO_LOWER(dns.question.type),
125 Esql.question_name_length = LENGTH(Esql.dns_question_name),
126 Esql.subdomain_length = LENGTH(Esql.dns_question_name) - LENGTH(Esql.dns_registered_domain) - 1
127| where
128 Esql.client_ip is not null
129 and (Esql.dns_question_type is null or Esql.dns_question_type != "ptr")
130 and not ENDS_WITH(Esql.dns_question_name, ".arpa")
131 and (
132 Esql.dns_question_type == "null"
133 or Esql.subdomain_length >= 50
134 or (Esql.dns_question_type == "txt" and Esql.question_name_length > 100)
135 )
136| eval
137 Esql.long_subdomain_query_name = CASE(
138 Esql.subdomain_length >= 50,
139 Esql.dns_question_name,
140 null
141 ),
142 Esql.null_query_name = CASE(
143 Esql.dns_question_type == "null",
144 Esql.dns_question_name,
145 null
146 ),
147 Esql.long_txt_query_name = CASE(
148 Esql.dns_question_type == "txt" and Esql.question_name_length > 100,
149 Esql.dns_question_name,
150 null
151 )
152| eval Esql.time_window = DATE_TRUNC(5 minutes, @timestamp)
153| stats
154 Esql.total_qualifying_queries = COUNT(*),
155 Esql.count_queries = COUNT(Esql.long_subdomain_query_name),
156 Esql.count_distinct_names = COUNT_DISTINCT(Esql.long_subdomain_query_name),
157 Esql.null_query_count = COUNT(Esql.null_query_name),
158 Esql.null_distinct_names = COUNT_DISTINCT(Esql.null_query_name),
159 Esql.long_txt_query_count = COUNT(Esql.long_txt_query_name),
160 Esql.long_txt_distinct_names = COUNT_DISTINCT(Esql.long_txt_query_name),
161 Esql.max_question_name_length = MAX(Esql.question_name_length),
162 Esql.avg_question_name_length = AVG(Esql.question_name_length),
163 Esql.max_subdomain_length = MAX(Esql.subdomain_length),
164 Esql.avg_subdomain_length = AVG(Esql.subdomain_length),
165 Esql.dns_question_type_values = MV_SLICE(VALUES(Esql.dns_question_type), 0, 9),
166 Esql.destination_ip_values = MV_SLICE(VALUES(destination.ip), 0, 4),
167 Esql.sample_names = MV_SLICE(VALUES(Esql.dns_question_name), 0, 4),
168 Esql.dataset_values = MV_SLICE(VALUES(Esql.dataset), 0, 9),
169 Esql.observer_name_values = MV_SLICE(VALUES(observer.name), 0, 19),
170 Esql.first_seen = MIN(@timestamp),
171 Esql.last_seen = MAX(@timestamp)
172 by Esql.time_window, Esql.client_ip, Esql.dns_registered_domain
173| eval Esql.unique_name_ratio = CASE(
174 Esql.count_queries > 0,
175 TO_DOUBLE(Esql.count_distinct_names) / Esql.count_queries,
176 null
177 )
178| where
179 (
180 Esql.count_queries >= 25
181 and Esql.count_distinct_names >= 15
182 )
183 or (
184 Esql.null_query_count >= 3
185 and Esql.null_distinct_names >= 2
186 )
187 or (
188 Esql.long_txt_query_count >= 5
189 and Esql.long_txt_distinct_names >= 5
190 )
191| keep Esql.*
192'''
193
194
195[[rule.threat]]
196framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
197[[rule.threat.technique]]
198id = "T1071"
199name = "Application Layer Protocol"
200reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1071/"
201[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
202id = "T1071.004"
203name = "DNS"
204reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1071/004/"
205
206
207[[rule.threat.technique]]
208id = "T1572"
209name = "Protocol Tunneling"
210reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1572/"
211
212
213[rule.threat.tactic]
214id = "TA0011"
215name = "Command and Control"
216reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0011/"
217[[rule.threat]]
218framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
219[[rule.threat.technique]]
220id = "T1048"
221name = "Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol"
222reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1048/"
223[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
224id = "T1048.003"
225name = "Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol"
226reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1048/003/"
227
228
229
230[rule.threat.tactic]
231id = "TA0010"
232name = "Exfiltration"
233reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0010/"
234
235[rule.investigation_fields]
236field_names = [
237 "Esql.client_ip",
238 "Esql.dns_registered_domain",
239 "Esql.time_window",
240 "Esql.total_qualifying_queries",
241 "Esql.count_queries",
242 "Esql.count_distinct_names",
243 "Esql.unique_name_ratio",
244 "Esql.null_query_count",
245 "Esql.null_distinct_names",
246 "Esql.long_txt_query_count",
247 "Esql.long_txt_distinct_names",
248 "Esql.dns_question_type_values",
249 "Esql.max_question_name_length",
250 "Esql.avg_question_name_length",
251 "Esql.max_subdomain_length",
252 "Esql.avg_subdomain_length",
253 "Esql.destination_ip_values",
254 "Esql.sample_names",
255 "Esql.dataset_values",
256 "Esql.observer_name_values",
257 "Esql.first_seen",
258 "Esql.last_seen",
259]
Triage and analysis
Investigating Potential DNS Tunneling via NULL or Long DNS Queries
DNS tunneling encodes data in query labels and often produces many unique, unusually long subdomains under a single apex domain. Some tunneling tools also use rare NULL queries or long TXT query names. This rule aggregates network DNS telemetry for those behavioral patterns without relying on threat intelligence feeds or machine learning jobs.
Compare overlapping apex domains against the machine learning DNS Tunneling rule when that job is enabled.
Possible investigation steps
- Review
Esql.dns_registered_domain,Esql.dns_question_type_values,Esql.total_qualifying_queries,Esql.count_distinct_names,Esql.unique_name_ratio,Esql.max_question_name_length,Esql.max_subdomain_length, and sample values inEsql.sample_names. - NULL alerts require at least three queries and two distinct names. Long-TXT alerts require at least five distinct names longer than 100 characters. The general long-subdomain branch retains the original threshold of 25 queries and 15 distinct names across all query types.
Esql.count_queries,Esql.count_distinct_names, andEsql.unique_name_ratiodescribe only long-subdomain activity. For alerts triggered only by NULL or long-TXT queries, both counts may be zero and the ratio will be null.- TXT, NULL, CNAME, or MX bursts increase confidence; A/AAAA-only activity can still be tunneling and should not be dismissed on type alone.
- Use
Esql.first_seen,Esql.last_seen,Esql.dataset_values, andEsql.observer_name_valuesto establish the event span and identify the integrations and sensors that contributed to the alert. - Confirm whether
Esql.client_ipis a workstation, server, recursive resolver, forwarder, NAT address, or localhost DNS service. Resolver and localhost sources merge many clients and are a common false-positive pattern. - Review
Esql.destination_ip_valuesto identify the resolver or authoritative destination observed by the sensor. - Pivot on the same client and apex domain in raw DNS events and look for follow-on process, file, or additional C2 activity.
False positive analysis
- CDN, cloud load-balancer, certificate, and software-update services often create long hostnames. Confirm the apex domain reputation and whether the requesting host role normally uses that provider.
- Security or network appliances performing DNS-based reachability or reputation checks can resemble tunneling. Exclude confirmed appliance addresses after validation.
- Do not create a global resolver exception until the originating endpoint is known; a shared
Esql.client_ipcan hide a single infected host behind legitimate bulk lookups.
Response and remediation
- Block the apex domain or forwarding from the affected host at recursive resolvers if malicious activity is confirmed.
- Isolate the source host and inspect for tunneling tools or malware initiating the queries.
- Add temporary blocks for the apex domain while scoping additional hosts querying the same name.
References
Related rules
- SMTP to the Internet on Port 26/TCP
- Newly Observed IPSEC NAT Traversal Peer
- SMB (Windows File Sharing) Activity to the Internet
- Potential DNS Rebinding from Public to Private Address
- Potential Self-Signed TLS Certificate Recently Issued on External Connection