Potential ClickFix Command via Windows Run Dialog
Identifies suspicious commands written to the Windows Run dialog history (RunMRU) by explorer.exe. Adversaries socially engineer users to copy and paste malicious commands for execution, a pattern commonly seen in Fake CAPTCHA (ClickFix) campaigns. Investigate the process tree for a child of explorer.exe that matches the stored command.
Elastic rule (View on GitHub)
1[metadata]
2creation_date = "2026/09/24"
3integration = ["endpoint", "windows", "m365_defender", "sentinel_one_cloud_funnel", "crowdstrike"]
4maturity = "production"
5updated_date = "2026/09/24"
6
7[rule]
8author = ["Elastic"]
9description = """
10Identifies suspicious commands written to the Windows Run dialog history (RunMRU) by explorer.exe. Adversaries socially
11engineer users to copy and paste malicious commands for execution, a pattern commonly seen in Fake CAPTCHA (ClickFix)
12campaigns. Investigate the process tree for a child of explorer.exe that matches the stored command.
13"""
14from = "now-9m"
15language = "esql"
16license = "Elastic License v2"
17name = "Potential ClickFix Command via Windows Run Dialog"
18note = """## Triage and analysis
19
20### Investigating Potential ClickFix Command via Windows Run Dialog
21
22#### Possible investigation steps
23
24- What command was stored in the Run dialog history?
25 - Why: RunMRU records the command submitted through the Windows Run dialog. ClickFix and Fake CAPTCHA pages instruct the victim to paste that command.
26 - Focus:`registry.data.strings`.
27 - Implication: escalate when the string downloads content, decodes a payload, hides the window, or hands execution to PowerShell, cmd, mshta, msiexec, rundll32, certutil, curl, wget, or bitsadmin. Lower suspicion only when the same string is a bounded support or install command from a recognized workflow.
28
29- Did explorer.exe launch a child that matches the stored command?
30 - Why: the alerting process is explorer.exe writing Run dialog history. The pasted command runs as a child of that explorer instance.
31 - Focus: child process starts where `process.parent.entity_id` equals the alert `process.entity_id`. Compare child `process.name`, `process.executable`, and `process.command_line` with `registry.data.strings`.
32 - Implication: escalate when a child shell, script host, or living-off-the-land binary matches the RunMRU string. No matching child leaves execution unproven.
33
34- What did that child do next?
35 - Focus: descendants of the recovered child `process.entity_id`, plus file and network events scoped to that child. Review `process.command_line`, `file.path`, `dns.question.name`, and `destination.ip`.
36 - Hint: if the child entity id is absent, fall back to `host.id` plus the child `process.pid` in a tight window. Missing file or network telemetry leaves those questions unresolved.
37 - Implication: escalate when the child retrieves a payload, writes a script or executable under a user-writable path, spawns further shells, or contacts an unusual destination.
38
39- Does the user and host context fit a planned paste-and-run action?
40 - Focus: `user.id`, `user.name`, `host.id`, and `host.name`, plus browser, chat, or mail activity just before the RunMRU write.
41 - Implication: escalate when an end-user host has no change window for the command. A lab or awareness exercise is lower suspicion only when the command, user, and host all match that exercise.
42
43- Escalate when the RunMRU command shows download, decode, hidden execution, or living-off-the-land staging and the process tree, artifacts, destinations, or related alerts support execution. Close only when the stored command, launched child, user, and host bind to one authorized simulation or lab workflow with no contradiction. If evidence is mixed or visibility is incomplete, preserve evidence and escalate.
44
45### False positive analysis
46
47- Security-awareness, phishing-simulation, red-team, and malware-analysis labs can paste these commands into the Run dialog. Confirm one workflow: the `registry.data.strings` value, the expected child `process.executable` and `process.command_line`, and a bounded `user.id` / `host.id`, with recovered children and destinations inside the exercise.
48- Administrators sometimes launch a signed installer or diagnostic through the Run dialog. Close only when the stored command and child process are that exact tool, with no download cradle, encoded command, or second-stage child.
49- Before an exception, require the same `registry.data.strings` fragment, `user.id`, and `host.id` across prior alerts from this rule. Avoid exceptions on `explorer.exe`, the RunMRU path, or `user.name` alone.
50
51### Response and remediation
52
53- If confirmed benign, reverse temporary containment and record the command, child identity, `user.id`, and `host.id` that proved the workflow. Create an exception only when that exact workflow recurs.
54- If suspicious but unconfirmed, export the registry event, `registry.data.strings`, the explorer `process.entity_id`, and the child process tree, command lines, file paths, and destinations before cleanup. Apply reversible controls first, such as temporary destination blocks, a browser-session reset, or heightened monitoring. Isolate the host when retrieval or second-stage execution makes continued connectivity risky.
55- If confirmed malicious, isolate the host, then terminate the child process and suspicious descendants after recording identifiers. Remove staged scripts, archives, and payloads, and block confirmed domains, IPs, hashes, or URLs. Reset credentials only when the investigation shows account misuse.
56- Post-incident hardening: retain registry and process telemetry for Run dialog triage, review browser and paste-execution controls, and record the lure wording and paste-run chain in the case notes.
57"""
58references = [
59 "https://www.elastic.co/security-labs/threat-command/telepuz-maas-malware-clickfix",
60 "https://www.elastic.co/security-labs/threat-command/mimicrat-custom-rat-mimics-c2-frameworks"
61]
62risk_score = 73
63rule_id = "856a31f9-7869-4a5f-aca8-275a77629f19"
64setup = """## Setup
65
66This rule is designed for data generated by [Elastic Defend](https://www.elastic.co/security/endpoint-security), which provides native endpoint detection and response, along with event enrichments designed to work with our detection rules.
67
68Setup instructions: https://ela.st/install-elastic-defend
69
70### Additional data sources
71
72This rule also supports the following third-party data sources. For setup instructions, refer to the links below:
73
74- [CrowdStrike](https://ela.st/crowdstrike-integration)
75- [Microsoft Defender XDR](https://ela.st/m365-defender)
76- [SentinelOne Cloud Funnel](https://ela.st/sentinel-one-cloud-funnel)
77- [Sysmon Registry Events](https://ela.st/sysmon-event-reg-setup)
78"""
79severity = "high"
80tags = [
81 "Domain: Endpoint",
82 "OS: Windows",
83 "Use Case: Threat Detection",
84 "Tactic: Execution",
85 "Tactic: Defense Evasion",
86 "Tactic: Command and Control",
87 "Data Source: Elastic Defend",
88 "Data Source: Sysmon",
89 "Data Source: Microsoft Defender XDR",
90 "Data Source: SentinelOne",
91 "Data Source: Crowdstrike",
92 "Resources: Investigation Guide",
93 "Threat: ClickFix",
94 "Threat: Living off the Land",
95 "Rule Type: ES|QL",
96 "Platform: Windows",
97]
98timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
99type = "esql"
100
101query = '''
102from logs-endpoint.events.registry-*, logs-windows.sysmon_operational-*, winlogbeat-*,
103 logs-windows.forwarded-*, logs-m365_defender.event-*, logs-sentinel_one_cloud_funnel.*,
104 logs-crowdstrike.fdr* metadata _id, _version, _index
105| where KQL(""" host.os.type : "windows" AND event.category:"registry" AND process.name:explorer.exe AND event.type : ("creation" or "change") """)
106 and registry.data.strings is not null
107 and (
108 to_lower(registry.path) like """hkey_users\\*\\software\\microsoft\\windows\\currentversion\\explorer\\runmru\\*"""
109 or to_lower(registry.path) like """\\registry\\user\\*\\software\\microsoft\\windows\\currentversion\\explorer\\runmru\\*"""
110 or to_lower(registry.path) like """hku\\*\\software\\microsoft\\windows\\currentversion\\explorer\\runmru\\*"""
111 or to_lower(registry.path) like """hkcu\\software\\microsoft\\windows\\currentversion\\explorer\\runmru\\*"""
112 or to_lower(registry.path) like """hkey_current_user\\software\\microsoft\\windows\\currentversion\\explorer\\runmru\\*"""
113 )
114 and not to_lower(registry.path) like """*\\runmru\\mrulist"""
115| eval registry_data = to_lower(mv_concat(registry.data.strings, " "))
116| where
117 // PowerShell / PowerShell 7 with suspicious arguments or content
118 (
119 (registry_data like "*powershell*" or registry_data like "*pwsh*") and
120 (
121 registry_data like "* -e *" or
122 registry_data like "* -ec *" or
123 registry_data like "* -en*" or
124 registry_data like "*irm *" or
125 registry_data like "*iwr *" or
126 registry_data like "*iex *" or
127 registry_data like "*iex(*" or
128 registry_data like "*invoke-restmethod*" or
129 registry_data like "*invoke-webrequest*" or
130 registry_data like "*invoke-expression*" or
131 registry_data like "*invoke-command*" or
132 registry_data like "*$executioncontext.invokecommand*" or
133 registry_data like "*webclient*" or
134 registry_data like "*downloadstring*" or
135 registry_data like "*downloadfile*" or
136 registry_data like "*http*" or
137 registry_data like "*bypass*" or
138 registry_data like "* -w* h*" or
139 registry_data like "* -w* mi*" or
140 registry_data like "*start-process*" or
141 registry_data like "*frombase64string*" or
142 registry_data like "*substring*" or
143 registry_data like "*+*+*+*"
144 )
145 )
146 or
147 // Remote content and script execution through other utilities
148 (
149 registry_data like "*msiexec*http*" or
150 registry_data like """*msiexec*\\\\*""" or
151 registry_data like "*mshta*http*" or
152 registry_data like "*mshta*javascript:*" or
153 registry_data like "*mshta*vbscript:*" or
154 registry_data like """*mshta*\\\\*""" or
155 registry_data like "*rundll32*http*" or
156 registry_data like "*rundll32*javascript:*" or
157 registry_data like """*rundll32*\\\\*""" or
158 registry_data like "*rundll32*mshtml*" or
159 registry_data like "*cmd*http*" or
160 registry_data like "*cmd*set*&set*" or
161 registry_data like "*conhost*--headless*" or
162 registry_data like "*forfiles* /c *" or
163 registry_data like "*certutil* -urlcache*" or
164 registry_data like "*certutil* -decode*" or
165 registry_data like "*curl*http*" or
166 registry_data like "*wget*http*" or
167 registry_data like "*bitsadmin*/transfer*" or
168 registry_data like "*|powershell*" or
169 registry_data like "*|pwsh*" or
170 registry_data like "*iex*irm *" or
171 registry_data like "*iex*iwr *"
172 )
173| keep _id, _version, _index, data_stream.namespace, @timestamp, event.dataset, user.id, user.name, user.domain, host.id, host.name, agent.id, process.name, process.entity_id, process.executable, process.pid, registry.data.strings, registry.path
174'''
175
176
177[[rule.threat]]
178framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
179[[rule.threat.technique]]
180id = "T1059"
181name = "Command and Scripting Interpreter"
182reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/"
183[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
184id = "T1059.001"
185name = "PowerShell"
186reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/001/"
187
188[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
189id = "T1059.003"
190name = "Windows Command Shell"
191reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059/003/"
192
193
194[[rule.threat.technique]]
195id = "T1204"
196name = "User Execution"
197reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1204/"
198[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
199id = "T1204.004"
200name = "Malicious Copy and Paste"
201reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1204/004/"
202
203
204
205[rule.threat.tactic]
206id = "TA0002"
207name = "Execution"
208reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0002/"
209[[rule.threat]]
210framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
211[[rule.threat.technique]]
212id = "T1218"
213name = "System Binary Proxy Execution"
214reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1218/"
215[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
216id = "T1218.005"
217name = "Mshta"
218reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1218/005/"
219
220[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
221id = "T1218.007"
222name = "Msiexec"
223reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1218/007/"
224
225[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
226id = "T1218.011"
227name = "Rundll32"
228reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1218/011/"
229
230
231
232[rule.threat.tactic]
233id = "TA0005"
234name = "Defense Evasion"
235reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0005/"
236[[rule.threat]]
237framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
238[[rule.threat.technique]]
239id = "T1105"
240name = "Ingress Tool Transfer"
241reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1105/"
242
243
244[rule.threat.tactic]
245id = "TA0011"
246name = "Command and Control"
247reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0011/"
248
249[rule.investigation_fields]
250field_names = [
251 "@timestamp",
252 "host.name",
253 "host.id",
254 "user.name",
255 "user.id",
256 "process.entity_id",
257 "process.pid",
258 "process.name",
259 "process.executable",
260 "registry.path",
261 "registry.data.strings",
262]
Triage and analysis
Investigating Potential ClickFix Command via Windows Run Dialog
Possible investigation steps
-
What command was stored in the Run dialog history?
- Why: RunMRU records the command submitted through the Windows Run dialog. ClickFix and Fake CAPTCHA pages instruct the victim to paste that command.
- Focus:
registry.data.strings. - Implication: escalate when the string downloads content, decodes a payload, hides the window, or hands execution to PowerShell, cmd, mshta, msiexec, rundll32, certutil, curl, wget, or bitsadmin. Lower suspicion only when the same string is a bounded support or install command from a recognized workflow.
-
Did explorer.exe launch a child that matches the stored command?
- Why: the alerting process is explorer.exe writing Run dialog history. The pasted command runs as a child of that explorer instance.
- Focus: child process starts where
process.parent.entity_idequals the alertprocess.entity_id. Compare childprocess.name,process.executable, andprocess.command_linewithregistry.data.strings. - Implication: escalate when a child shell, script host, or living-off-the-land binary matches the RunMRU string. No matching child leaves execution unproven.
-
What did that child do next?
- Focus: descendants of the recovered child
process.entity_id, plus file and network events scoped to that child. Reviewprocess.command_line,file.path,dns.question.name, anddestination.ip. - Hint: if the child entity id is absent, fall back to
host.idplus the childprocess.pidin a tight window. Missing file or network telemetry leaves those questions unresolved. - Implication: escalate when the child retrieves a payload, writes a script or executable under a user-writable path, spawns further shells, or contacts an unusual destination.
- Focus: descendants of the recovered child
-
Does the user and host context fit a planned paste-and-run action?
- Focus:
user.id,user.name,host.id, andhost.name, plus browser, chat, or mail activity just before the RunMRU write. - Implication: escalate when an end-user host has no change window for the command. A lab or awareness exercise is lower suspicion only when the command, user, and host all match that exercise.
- Focus:
-
Escalate when the RunMRU command shows download, decode, hidden execution, or living-off-the-land staging and the process tree, artifacts, destinations, or related alerts support execution. Close only when the stored command, launched child, user, and host bind to one authorized simulation or lab workflow with no contradiction. If evidence is mixed or visibility is incomplete, preserve evidence and escalate.
False positive analysis
- Security-awareness, phishing-simulation, red-team, and malware-analysis labs can paste these commands into the Run dialog. Confirm one workflow: the
registry.data.stringsvalue, the expected childprocess.executableandprocess.command_line, and a boundeduser.id/host.id, with recovered children and destinations inside the exercise. - Administrators sometimes launch a signed installer or diagnostic through the Run dialog. Close only when the stored command and child process are that exact tool, with no download cradle, encoded command, or second-stage child.
- Before an exception, require the same
registry.data.stringsfragment,user.id, andhost.idacross prior alerts from this rule. Avoid exceptions onexplorer.exe, the RunMRU path, oruser.namealone.
Response and remediation
- If confirmed benign, reverse temporary containment and record the command, child identity,
user.id, andhost.idthat proved the workflow. Create an exception only when that exact workflow recurs. - If suspicious but unconfirmed, export the registry event,
registry.data.strings, the explorerprocess.entity_id, and the child process tree, command lines, file paths, and destinations before cleanup. Apply reversible controls first, such as temporary destination blocks, a browser-session reset, or heightened monitoring. Isolate the host when retrieval or second-stage execution makes continued connectivity risky. - If confirmed malicious, isolate the host, then terminate the child process and suspicious descendants after recording identifiers. Remove staged scripts, archives, and payloads, and block confirmed domains, IPs, hashes, or URLs. Reset credentials only when the investigation shows account misuse.
- Post-incident hardening: retain registry and process telemetry for Run dialog triage, review browser and paste-execution controls, and record the lure wording and paste-run chain in the case notes.
References
Related rules
- Suspicious Shell Execution via Velociraptor
- ImageLoad via Windows Update Auto Update Client
- Potential Fake CAPTCHA Phishing Attack
- Potential File Transfer via Certreq
- Suspicious .NET Code Compilation