AWS EKS Access Entry Created Then Deleted by Same Identity
Detects the creation of an Amazon EKS access entry followed by its deletion by the same identity within a short time window. EKS access entries define Kubernetes RBAC-level permissions for IAM principals in an EKS cluster. An adversary with EKS administrative access may temporarily grant themselves cluster access, use those permissions to create Kubernetes RBAC resources (ClusterRoleBindings, ServiceAccounts with privileged roles), and then delete the access entry to hide the evidence of the initial grant while retaining access through the Kubernetes-level backdoor.
Elastic rule (View on GitHub)
1[metadata]
2creation_date = "2026/08/14"
3integration = ["aws"]
4maturity = "production"
5updated_date = "2026/08/14"
6
7[rule]
8author = ["Elastic"]
9description = """
10Detects the creation of an Amazon EKS access entry followed by its deletion by the same
11identity within a short time window. EKS access entries define Kubernetes RBAC-level
12permissions for IAM principals in an EKS cluster. An adversary with EKS administrative
13access may temporarily grant themselves cluster access, use those permissions to create
14Kubernetes RBAC resources (ClusterRoleBindings, ServiceAccounts with privileged roles),
15and then delete the access entry to hide the evidence of the initial grant while retaining
16access through the Kubernetes-level backdoor.
17"""
18false_positives = [
19 """
20 Automated infrastructure tests that create and immediately tear down EKS access entries
21 as part of CI/CD validation may trigger this rule. Validate that the sequence corresponds
22 to a documented test pipeline.
23 """,
24]
25from = "now-15m"
26index = ["logs-aws.cloudtrail-*"]
27language = "eql"
28license = "Elastic License v2"
29name = "AWS EKS Access Entry Created Then Deleted by Same Identity"
30note = """## Triage and analysis
31
32### Investigating AWS EKS Access Entry Created Then Deleted by Same Identity
33
34EKS access entries (introduced in EKS API mode) map IAM principals to Kubernetes access policies or allow associating Kubernetes groups to IAM principals. An adversary who obtains `eks:CreateAccessEntry` and `eks:DeleteAccessEntry` permissions can:
35
361. Create an access entry for their own IAM principal with cluster-admin level access.
372. Use that access to create persistent Kubernetes RBAC resources (ClusterRoleBindings, privileged ServiceAccounts, rogue DaemonSets).
383. Delete the access entry, removing the CloudTrail evidence of the initial grant while retaining Kubernetes-level access.
39
40This sequence is analogous to adding a backdoor user, using it, then deleting it to cover tracks. The deletion within a short window of creation is the key behavioral indicator.
41
42### Possible investigation steps
43
44- Identify the calling identity from `aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn` and the targeted cluster from `aws.cloudtrail.request_parameters`.
45- Review Kubernetes audit logs for the affected cluster in the time window between the `CreateAccessEntry` and `DeleteAccessEntry` events. Look for `create` verbs on ClusterRoleBindings, RoleBindings, ServiceAccounts, or DaemonSets.
46- Check the cluster's current RBAC configuration for persistent backdoor resources.
47- Determine whether the identity had a legitimate reason to create an access entry for the targeted cluster.
48
49### False positive analysis
50
51- Infrastructure-as-code and CI/CD pipelines that create and tear down EKS access entries as part of cluster validation — Terraform or eksctl apply/destroy cycles, ephemeral test clusters — will produce this exact sequence. Correlate with the pipeline identity and change records before triaging further.
52- Short-lived break-glass or just-in-time administrative access that is granted and revoked by the same operator within minutes is legitimate; confirm against access-request tickets or change approvals.
53- Migration tooling that switches clusters between authentication modes may churn access entries in bulk under a single automation role.
54- The sequence correlates on the calling identity only, so confirm the `CreateAccessEntry` and `DeleteAccessEntry` events reference the same cluster and principal ARN in the request parameters before treating them as one grant-and-revoke cycle.
55- Scope any exceptions by the calling ARN or automation role rather than excluding the behavior globally.
56
57### Response and remediation
58
59- Audit all Kubernetes RBAC resources for unauthorized ClusterRoleBindings or privileged ServiceAccounts created in the suspect window.
60- Rotate credentials for the calling identity.
61- Apply IAM policies restricting `eks:CreateAccessEntry` and `eks:DeleteAccessEntry` to designated EKS administrative roles.
62"""
63references = [
64 "https://docs.aws.amazon.com/eks/latest/APIReference/API_CreateAccessEntry.html",
65 "https://docs.aws.amazon.com/eks/latest/APIReference/API_DeleteAccessEntry.html",
66 "https://www.wiz.io/blog/new-attack-vectors-emerge-via-recent-eks-access-entries-and-pod-identity-features",
67 "https://securitylabs.datadoghq.com/articles/eks-cluster-access-management-deep-dive/",
68]
69risk_score = 47
70rule_id = "2b60fb61-d0c7-405e-9f33-a66d8729628d"
71setup = "The AWS integration must be ingesting management events into `logs-aws.cloudtrail-*`. EKS management events are logged by default."
72severity = "medium"
73tags = [
74 "Domain: Cloud",
75 "Domain: Kubernetes",
76 "Platform: AWS",
77 "Platform: Kubernetes",
78 "Data Source: AWS CloudTrail",
79 "Service: AWS EKS",
80 "Rule Type: Event Correlation (EQL)",
81 "Tactic: Persistence",
82 "Resources: Investigation Guide",
83]
84timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
85type = "eql"
86
87query = '''
88sequence by aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn with maxspan=5m
89 [any where data_stream.dataset == "aws.cloudtrail" and event.provider == "eks.amazonaws.com" and event.action == "CreateAccessEntry" and event.outcome == "success" and aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn != null]
90 [any where data_stream.dataset == "aws.cloudtrail" and event.provider == "eks.amazonaws.com" and event.action == "DeleteAccessEntry" and event.outcome == "success" and aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn != null]
91'''
92
93[[rule.threat]]
94framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
95[[rule.threat.technique]]
96id = "T1098"
97name = "Account Manipulation"
98reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1098/"
99[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
100id = "T1098.006"
101name = "Additional Container Cluster Roles"
102reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1098/006/"
103
104[rule.threat.tactic]
105id = "TA0003"
106name = "Persistence"
107reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0003/"
108
109[rule.investigation_fields]
110field_names = [
111 "@timestamp",
112 "aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn",
113 "aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.type",
114 "user.name",
115 "event.action",
116 "event.outcome",
117 "aws.cloudtrail.request_parameters",
118 "source.ip",
119 "cloud.region",
120 "cloud.account.id",
121]
Triage and analysis
Investigating AWS EKS Access Entry Created Then Deleted by Same Identity
EKS access entries (introduced in EKS API mode) map IAM principals to Kubernetes access policies or allow associating Kubernetes groups to IAM principals. An adversary who obtains eks:CreateAccessEntry and eks:DeleteAccessEntry permissions can:
- Create an access entry for their own IAM principal with cluster-admin level access.
- Use that access to create persistent Kubernetes RBAC resources (ClusterRoleBindings, privileged ServiceAccounts, rogue DaemonSets).
- Delete the access entry, removing the CloudTrail evidence of the initial grant while retaining Kubernetes-level access.
This sequence is analogous to adding a backdoor user, using it, then deleting it to cover tracks. The deletion within a short window of creation is the key behavioral indicator.
Possible investigation steps
- Identify the calling identity from
aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arnand the targeted cluster fromaws.cloudtrail.request_parameters. - Review Kubernetes audit logs for the affected cluster in the time window between the
CreateAccessEntryandDeleteAccessEntryevents. Look forcreateverbs on ClusterRoleBindings, RoleBindings, ServiceAccounts, or DaemonSets. - Check the cluster's current RBAC configuration for persistent backdoor resources.
- Determine whether the identity had a legitimate reason to create an access entry for the targeted cluster.
False positive analysis
- Infrastructure-as-code and CI/CD pipelines that create and tear down EKS access entries as part of cluster validation — Terraform or eksctl apply/destroy cycles, ephemeral test clusters — will produce this exact sequence. Correlate with the pipeline identity and change records before triaging further.
- Short-lived break-glass or just-in-time administrative access that is granted and revoked by the same operator within minutes is legitimate; confirm against access-request tickets or change approvals.
- Migration tooling that switches clusters between authentication modes may churn access entries in bulk under a single automation role.
- The sequence correlates on the calling identity only, so confirm the
CreateAccessEntryandDeleteAccessEntryevents reference the same cluster and principal ARN in the request parameters before treating them as one grant-and-revoke cycle. - Scope any exceptions by the calling ARN or automation role rather than excluding the behavior globally.
Response and remediation
- Audit all Kubernetes RBAC resources for unauthorized ClusterRoleBindings or privileged ServiceAccounts created in the suspect window.
- Rotate credentials for the calling identity.
- Apply IAM policies restricting
eks:CreateAccessEntryandeks:DeleteAccessEntryto designated EKS administrative roles.
References
Related rules
- AWS Lambda Function Policy Updated to Allow Public Invocation
- AWS Lambda Function URL Created with Public Access
- AWS RDS DB Instance Made Public
- AWS EC2 EBS Snapshot Access Removed
- AWS EC2 Network Access Control List Creation