AWS EC2 LOLBin Execution via SSM SendCommand
Identifies the execution of Living Off the Land Binaries (LOLBins) or GTFOBins on EC2 instances via AWS Systems Manager
(SSM) SendCommand API. This detection correlates AWS CloudTrail SendCommand events with endpoint process execution
by matching SSM command IDs. While AWS redacts command parameters in CloudTrail logs, this correlation technique reveals
the actual commands executed on EC2 instances. Adversaries may abuse SSM to execute malicious commands remotely without
requiring SSH or RDP access, using legitimate system utilities for data exfiltration, establishing reverse shells, or
lateral movement.
Elastic rule (View on GitHub)
1[metadata]
2creation_date = "2025/11/23"
3integration = ["aws", "endpoint"]
4maturity = "production"
5updated_date = "2025/11/23"
6
7[rule]
8author = ["Elastic"]
9description = """
10Identifies the execution of Living Off the Land Binaries (LOLBins) or GTFOBins on EC2 instances via AWS Systems Manager
11(SSM) `SendCommand` API. This detection correlates AWS CloudTrail `SendCommand` events with endpoint process execution
12by matching SSM command IDs. While AWS redacts command parameters in CloudTrail logs, this correlation technique reveals
13the actual commands executed on EC2 instances. Adversaries may abuse SSM to execute malicious commands remotely without
14requiring SSH or RDP access, using legitimate system utilities for data exfiltration, establishing reverse shells, or
15lateral movement.
16"""
17false_positives = [
18 """
19 Legitimate administrative tasks using SSM to run system utilities may trigger this rule. Review the command context,
20 user identity, and timing to determine if the activity is authorized.
21 """,
22 """
23 Automated configuration management or monitoring scripts that use LOLBins via SSM for legitimate purposes. Consider
24 excluding known automation accounts or specific command patterns.
25 """,
26]
27from = "now-9m"
28interval = "8m"
29language = "esql"
30license = "Elastic License v2"
31name = "AWS EC2 LOLBin Execution via SSM SendCommand"
32note = """## Triage and analysis
33
34### Investigating AWS EC2 LOLBin Execution via SSM SendCommand
35
36AWS Systems Manager (SSM) enables remote command execution on EC2 instances without SSH/RDP access. While legitimate for administration, adversaries exploit this by running LOLBins—system utilities abused for malicious purposes like data theft or backdoors. This detection correlates CloudTrail API logs with endpoint telemetry using SSM command IDs, bypassing AWS's parameter redaction to reveal actual executed commands and identify suspicious activity.
37
38This is an ESQL aggregation-based rule, thus all original event fields and detail may not be present in the alert. It is recommended to pivot into the raw events from both data sources for full context during investigation.
39
40### Possible investigation steps
41
42- Review the SSM command ID in the alert to track the full lifecycle of the command from initiation to execution across both CloudTrail and endpoint data
43- Examine the CloudTrail user identity, including the ARN and access key ID, to determine who initiated the SSM command and verify if the activity is authorized
44- Analyze the command lines of the executed LOLBins to understand what commands were run and assess their intent, looking for indicators of data exfiltration, reverse shells, or reconnaissance
45- Check the source IP address and user agent from the CloudTrail event to identify if the request came from an expected location or tool
46- Investigate the affected EC2 instances for other suspicious activities or signs of compromise during the same timeframe, including network connections and file modifications
47- Review the SSM shell process details to see the full context of what the SSM agent executed and identify the parent-child process relationships
48- Correlate the timing between the CloudTrail event and endpoint execution to ensure they occurred within the detection window and represent the same activity
49- Check if the same user identity or source IP has executed similar SSM commands on other EC2 instances in your environment
50
51### False positive analysis
52
53- Routine administrative scripts that use utilities like curl, wget, or python for legitimate configuration management should be documented and excluded by user identity or source IP
54- Automated monitoring tools that execute commands via SSM for health checks or data collection can be filtered by identifying their consistent patterns and access key IDs
55- DevOps CI/CD pipelines that deploy or test applications using SSM may trigger alerts; create exceptions based on known automation roles or specific command patterns
56- Security scanning tools that legitimately use SSM for vulnerability assessments should be allowlisted by their known IAM roles or source IPs
57- Scheduled maintenance tasks using LOLBins for backup, log rotation, or data synchronization can be excluded by command pattern matching or execution timing
58
59### Response and remediation
60
61- Immediately isolate the affected EC2 instance from the network to prevent further unauthorized command execution or lateral movement
62- Review AWS CloudTrail logs to identify the IAM user, role, or access key associated with the suspicious SSM command and revoke or rotate compromised credentials
63- Terminate any unauthorized processes identified on the endpoint that match the LOLBin execution patterns detected in the alert
64- Conduct a forensic analysis of the affected EC2 instance to identify any persistence mechanisms, backdoors, or data exfiltration indicators
65- Implement stricter IAM policies to limit SSM `SendCommand` permissions to only trusted users and roles, following the principle of least privilege
66- Enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) for IAM users with SSM execution privileges to reduce the risk of credential compromise
67- Review and update VPC security groups and network ACLs to restrict outbound traffic from EC2 instances to only necessary destinations, preventing data exfiltration
68- Escalate the incident to the security operations center (SOC) for further investigation and to determine if additional AWS resources or accounts have been compromised
69"""
70references = [
71 "https://www.mitiga.io/blog/abusing-the-amazon-web-services-ssm-agent-as-a-remote-access-trojan",
72 "https://www.kali.org/tools/pacu/",
73 "https://www.100daysofredteam.com/p/ghost-in-the-cloud-abusing-aws-ssm",
74 "https://hackingthe.cloud/aws/post_exploitation/run_shell_commands_on_ec2/",
75 "https://gtfobins.github.io/",
76]
77risk_score = 47
78rule_id = "a8b3e2f0-8c7d-11ef-b4c6-f661ea17fbcd"
79severity = "medium"
80tags = [
81 "Domain: Cloud",
82 "Domain: Endpoint",
83 "OS: Linux",
84 "Use Case: Threat Detection",
85 "Tactic: Execution",
86 "Tactic: Command and Control",
87 "Data Source: AWS",
88 "Data Source: Amazon Web Services",
89 "Data Source: AWS CloudTrail",
90 "Data Source: AWS EC2",
91 "Data Source: AWS SSM",
92 "Data Source: AWS Systems Manager",
93 "Data Source: Elastic Defend",
94 "Resources: Investigation Guide",
95]
96timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
97type = "esql"
98
99query = '''
100FROM logs-aws.cloudtrail*, logs-endpoint.events.process-* METADATA _id, _version, _index
101| WHERE
102 // CloudTrail SSM SendCommand with AWS-RunShellScript
103 (
104 event.dataset == "aws.cloudtrail"
105 AND event.action == "SendCommand"
106 AND aws.cloudtrail.request_parameters LIKE "*documentName=AWS-RunShellScript*"
107 )
108 // Linux endpoint process events, prefiltered to SSM shell runner OR LOLBins/GTFOBins
109 OR
110 (
111 event.dataset == "endpoint.events.process"
112 AND host.os.type == "linux"
113 AND (
114 // SSM shell (_script.sh) runner
115 process.command_line LIKE "%/document/orchestration/%/awsrunShellScript/%/_script.sh"
116 // LOLBins / GTFOBins
117 OR process.name IN (
118 "base64",
119 "curl",
120 "wget",
121 "openssl",
122 "nc", "ncat", "netcat",
123 "socat",
124 "python", "python3",
125 "perl",
126 "php",
127 "ruby",
128 "ssh",
129 "scp",
130 "sftp",
131 "rsync"
132 )
133 )
134 )
135
136// Endpoint leg: extract SSM command ID from parent command line
137| DISSECT process.parent.command_line
138 "%{}/document/orchestration/%{Esql.process_parent_command_line_ssm_command_id}/%{}"
139
140// CloudTrail leg: extract SSM command ID from response_elements
141| DISSECT aws.cloudtrail.response_elements
142 "%{}commandId=%{Esql.aws_cloudtrail_response_elements_ssm_command_id},%{}"
143
144// Coalesce SSM command ID from both data sources
145| EVAL Esql.aws_ssm_command_id = COALESCE(
146 Esql.aws_cloudtrail_response_elements_ssm_command_id,
147 Esql.process_parent_command_line_ssm_command_id
148)
149| WHERE Esql.aws_ssm_command_id IS NOT NULL
150
151// Role flags
152| EVAL Esql.is_cloud_event = event.dataset == "aws.cloudtrail"
153| EVAL Esql.is_endpoint_event = event.dataset == "endpoint.events.process"
154
155// Identify the SSM shell processes (the _script.sh runners)
156| EVAL Esql.is_ssm_shell_process =
157 Esql.is_endpoint_event
158 AND process.command_line LIKE "%/document/orchestration/%/awsrunShellScript/%/_script.sh"
159
160// LOLBins / GTFOBins on Linux
161| EVAL Esql.is_lolbin_process =
162 Esql.is_endpoint_event AND NOT Esql.is_ssm_shell_process
163
164// Aggregate per SSM command ID
165| STATS
166 // Core correlation counts & timing
167 Esql.aws_cloudtrail_event_count = SUM(CASE(Esql.is_cloud_event, 1, 0)),
168 Esql.endpoint_events_process_lolbin_count = SUM(CASE(Esql.is_lolbin_process, 1, 0)),
169 Esql.endpoint_events_process_ssm_shell_count = SUM(CASE(Esql.is_ssm_shell_process, 1, 0)),
170 Esql.aws_cloudtrail_first_event_ts = MIN(CASE(Esql.is_cloud_event, @timestamp, null)),
171 Esql.endpoint_events_process_first_lolbin_ts = MIN(CASE(Esql.is_lolbin_process, @timestamp, null)),
172
173 // AWS / CloudTrail identity & request context
174 Esql_priv.aws_cloudtrail_user_identity_arn_values =
175 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_cloud_event, aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.arn, null)),
176 Esql_priv.aws_cloudtrail_user_identity_access_key_id_values =
177 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_cloud_event, aws.cloudtrail.user_identity.access_key_id, null)),
178 Esql_priv.user_name_values =
179 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_cloud_event, user.name, null)),
180
181 // AWS environment / request metadata
182 Esql.cloud_region_values = VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_cloud_event, cloud.region, null)),
183 Esql.source_ip_values = VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_cloud_event, source.ip, null)),
184 Esql.user_agent_original_values =
185 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_cloud_event, user_agent.original, null)),
186
187 // Endpoint host & user context
188 Esql.host_name_values = VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_endpoint_event, host.name, null)),
189 Esql_priv.endpoint_user_name_values =
190 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_endpoint_event, user.name, null)),
191
192 // SSM shell processes on endpoint
193 Esql.process_command_line_ssm_shell_values =
194 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_ssm_shell_process, process.command_line, null)),
195 Esql.process_pid_ssm_shell_values =
196 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_ssm_shell_process, process.pid, null)),
197
198 // LOLBin processes on endpoint
199 Esql.process_name_lolbin_values =
200 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_lolbin_process, process.name, null)),
201 Esql.process_executable_lolbin_values =
202 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_lolbin_process, process.executable, null)),
203 Esql.process_command_line_lolbin_values =
204 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_lolbin_process, process.command_line, null)),
205 Esql.process_pid_lolbin_values =
206 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_lolbin_process, process.pid, null)),
207 Esql.process_parent_command_line_lolbin_values =
208 VALUES(CASE(Esql.is_lolbin_process, process.parent.command_line, null)),
209
210 Esql.data_stream_namespace_values = VALUES(data_stream.namespace)
211 BY Esql.aws_ssm_command_id
212
213// Detection condition: SSM SendCommand + AWS-RunShellScript + LOLBin on endpoint
214| WHERE Esql.aws_cloudtrail_event_count > 0
215 AND Esql.endpoint_events_process_lolbin_count > 0
216 AND DATE_DIFF(
217 "minutes",
218 Esql.endpoint_events_process_first_lolbin_ts,
219 Esql.aws_cloudtrail_first_event_ts
220 ) <= 5
221| SORT Esql.aws_cloudtrail_first_event_ts ASC
222| KEEP Esql.*, Esql_priv.*
223'''
224
225
226[[rule.threat]]
227framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
228[[rule.threat.technique]]
229id = "T1651"
230name = "Cloud Administration Command"
231reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1651/"
232
233
234[rule.threat.tactic]
235id = "TA0002"
236name = "Execution"
237reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0002/"
238[[rule.threat]]
239framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"
240[[rule.threat.technique]]
241id = "T1105"
242name = "Ingress Tool Transfer"
243reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1105/"
244
245
246[rule.threat.tactic]
247id = "TA0011"
248name = "Command and Control"
249reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0011/"
Triage and analysis
Investigating AWS EC2 LOLBin Execution via SSM SendCommand
AWS Systems Manager (SSM) enables remote command execution on EC2 instances without SSH/RDP access. While legitimate for administration, adversaries exploit this by running LOLBins—system utilities abused for malicious purposes like data theft or backdoors. This detection correlates CloudTrail API logs with endpoint telemetry using SSM command IDs, bypassing AWS's parameter redaction to reveal actual executed commands and identify suspicious activity.
This is an ESQL aggregation-based rule, thus all original event fields and detail may not be present in the alert. It is recommended to pivot into the raw events from both data sources for full context during investigation.
Possible investigation steps
- Review the SSM command ID in the alert to track the full lifecycle of the command from initiation to execution across both CloudTrail and endpoint data
- Examine the CloudTrail user identity, including the ARN and access key ID, to determine who initiated the SSM command and verify if the activity is authorized
- Analyze the command lines of the executed LOLBins to understand what commands were run and assess their intent, looking for indicators of data exfiltration, reverse shells, or reconnaissance
- Check the source IP address and user agent from the CloudTrail event to identify if the request came from an expected location or tool
- Investigate the affected EC2 instances for other suspicious activities or signs of compromise during the same timeframe, including network connections and file modifications
- Review the SSM shell process details to see the full context of what the SSM agent executed and identify the parent-child process relationships
- Correlate the timing between the CloudTrail event and endpoint execution to ensure they occurred within the detection window and represent the same activity
- Check if the same user identity or source IP has executed similar SSM commands on other EC2 instances in your environment
False positive analysis
- Routine administrative scripts that use utilities like curl, wget, or python for legitimate configuration management should be documented and excluded by user identity or source IP
- Automated monitoring tools that execute commands via SSM for health checks or data collection can be filtered by identifying their consistent patterns and access key IDs
- DevOps CI/CD pipelines that deploy or test applications using SSM may trigger alerts; create exceptions based on known automation roles or specific command patterns
- Security scanning tools that legitimately use SSM for vulnerability assessments should be allowlisted by their known IAM roles or source IPs
- Scheduled maintenance tasks using LOLBins for backup, log rotation, or data synchronization can be excluded by command pattern matching or execution timing
Response and remediation
- Immediately isolate the affected EC2 instance from the network to prevent further unauthorized command execution or lateral movement
- Review AWS CloudTrail logs to identify the IAM user, role, or access key associated with the suspicious SSM command and revoke or rotate compromised credentials
- Terminate any unauthorized processes identified on the endpoint that match the LOLBin execution patterns detected in the alert
- Conduct a forensic analysis of the affected EC2 instance to identify any persistence mechanisms, backdoors, or data exfiltration indicators
- Implement stricter IAM policies to limit SSM
SendCommandpermissions to only trusted users and roles, following the principle of least privilege - Enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) for IAM users with SSM execution privileges to reduce the risk of credential compromise
- Review and update VPC security groups and network ACLs to restrict outbound traffic from EC2 instances to only necessary destinations, preventing data exfiltration
- Escalate the incident to the security operations center (SOC) for further investigation and to determine if additional AWS resources or accounts have been compromised
References
Related rules
- AWS SSM `SendCommand` Execution by Rare User
- AWS SSM Command Document Created by Rare User
- Curl or Wget Egress Network Connection via LoLBin
- Suspicious Named Pipe Creation
- Simple HTTP Web Server Connection